| During the process of judicial practice, wiretapping is used increasingly in investigations for fight against crime. Wiretapping is an effective tool in attacking crime, but it also violate citizens' rights of privacy. The key of the problem lies in the lack of a clear legislation governing the use of wiretapping in our country chronically. Due to this oversight, there are no laws to abide by on how to properly conduct and acquire evidence via the use of wiretapping. Additionally, the party has no laws to abide by during the almsgiving process. Based on these factors, the use of wiretapping has been restrict greatly during in the process of judicial practice.Because of the above findings, I choose wiretapping as special visual angle in my research . I adopt comparative-analysis method in my article. Based on commenting on the legislation and theories of wiretapping of the main legal states and areas, I point out the problems which would be faced during the practice of wiretapping and propose the solutions on how to resolve the problems. The aim of the article is to seek the balance point between crime fighting activities and the protection of the individual privacy. Now the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law will be carried out soon, I hope that my article would give some suggestions on how to resolve the series problems and restrict the conduct of the process of wiretapping. |
