The Characteristic And Difference Of Public Prosecution And Private Prosecution In Qing Dynasty

First, the conclusion of this article stems from the statistical surveys of 158 cases in judgment stories of Qing dynasty. Before completing the statistical work I don't dare to estimate the conclusion in advance for that I want to avoid the embarrassment that comes from the disparity between subjective conjecture and objective analysis of data .Second, on the base of definition the concept of public prosecution and private prosecution clearly. The article has the statistical analysis in the cases of public prosecution and private prosecution separately, and quota description the conditions of public prosecution and private prosecution in Qing dynasty, and highlights the characteristics respectively. In the article, the criticism of typical cases provides a lot of dynamic scene of judgment, and make up for the flaw of the static statistical analysis.Third, through the above work, the article can draw a conclusion: in the traditions of respecting righteousness and disparaging advantage, the Qing empire presents the dichotomy structure in the area of public prosecution and private prosecution under the prosecution-appeasing official word. So the determination of static statistical and the iconicity of dynamic criticism can unify together, and can benefit each other.