Reconstruction Of The Village Organization

Under the current conditions of building rural communities, administrative villages and groups of villagers in rural communities are not as the basic unit. The villages are perhaps more appropriate choice. Since 1949, the rural grass-roots organizations experienced by the changes of the villages to the production teams and then to the groups of villagers. As the agricultural collectivization of agriculture is not their own needs, the production team is not the establishment and development of the village community needs, but in order to meet the needs of the industrialized country, rely on the state's mandatory super-economic results. Against such a background, step by step by toward collectivization of agriculture, natural and traditional village communities have been gradually cut by political power and re-integrated into the large community. Paid a heavy price, the state' logic and the farmers' achieve a compromise. And then improved and stabilized the production team system in the rural grass-roots. At the same time, the production team had gradually replaced the traditional family and community functions, or even taken up this commitment by the state organs of political and social management functions. Ultra-economic coercion and continued education campaigns can not conceal the inefficient production team system and members' desire of single-family operating. With the end of the political high-pressure, the production team system was toward the end, then replaced by the establishment of groups of villagers. Compared to the production teams, the role and function of groups of villagers has been greatly weakened, resulting in controversy about whether repealing the groups of villagers or not. Groups of villagers base on the land ownership which inherited the production team. The current legal system shows ambiguous provisions about collective farmers, which caused the virtual collective ownership of land. As a actual main body of the collective ownership of land, but groups of villagers are not the main body of a lawsuit between the legal qualifications. More importantly, the collective ownership of land clears the lines between groups of villagers. It is seemly against the community re-integration. Before collectivization in rural areas, village is a complete village community. Despite the impact of the collectivization and the marketization, but as a single-family-name village, the sense of community still exists and the tradition of community has not disappeared. After the reform, the rural experienced by a period of short-term prosperity, and then gradually declined. The decline of rural areas is not non-development, but process of rural development is far behind the urbanization. As the state power of long-term community-cutting villages, the villages' economic development has not brought about the improvement of collective income. While rural communities need to re-integration, the current land system has became a fundamental impediment. Therefore, to change the current land system, to reconstruct the community-based organizations, and to villages for the construction of unit in rural communities may be feasible.