Criminal procedure disputes exist in all aspects of criminal proceedings. They are mainly over issues related to the procedures of criminal proceedings between the accused and the court. This article argues that criminal procedure disputes should be adjudicated and thus solved by the court which takes neutral ground in the litigation relationship consisting of the prosecution,the accused and the court itself. In this dissertation the criminal procedure disputes and its court adjudication mechanism will be demonstrated in three aspects as follows:Part one is concept analysis of which the emphasis is to study the content of criminal procedure disputes and conflicts among the prosecution,the accused and the court and functions of the three sides. The manifestation of procedure disputes and ways as well as results of court adjudication will be demonstrated in this part.Part two is function analysis of which the emphasis is to study how the court adjudication mechanism of criminal procedure disputes works. By revealing the facts that the mechanism can bear fruit and ensure the independence of criminal procedure, I'll further analyse the the procedure-related benefits generated by the mechanism.Part three is operation analysis, and it's the emphasis of this whole dissertation. Using social science methodology, it will analyse China's current adjudication system and court-adjudication mode in criminal proceedings and how to include criminal procedure disputes in the court adjudication system. |