A Research On The Collapse Of Mainland Kuomintang Government

China witnessed a overturn in the late 40's of 20th and the Kuomintang kaiserdom was replaced by CCP' government after its 28-year-control over China. The Kuomintang is the biggest party of China at that time and administer a nation political power; At 1921, however, CCP set up a party of no more than 50 members, and more than 20 years thereafter, it's development was subjected to the restriction of Kuomintang. What is the reason why the results of these two parties with great disparity in position and strength turned out to be so unexpectable? For this, the academic circles holds different opinions, but a majority of scholars emphasize on the unilateral reason of Kuomintang. The author argues that in the modern history of China, the Kuomintang political power's gradual collapse and the growth and grandness of CCP , so as to its establishment of new China afterwards are two affairs carrying on in the meantime, which complementing each other. To study the reason of the collapse of Kuomintang's mainland political powers, we should refers to the successful foundation of a nation of CCP.This text elaborates this problem through five parts. The first part is about the Kuomintang's autarchy and the multiparty cooperation initiated by the CCP. This part mainly argues the formation of the Kuomintang's policy of "one party autocracy" , and points out under the policy, the other political parties and groups of China basically were excluded from the national regime, therefore, many democratic parties and patriotic group took the side of the CCP in succession. The CCP has been initiating multiparty cooperation, and carrying on it as a long-term policy. In the long-term conflict, Communist Party of China and other democratic parties and personages without party affiliation have become strong political alliance, in addition, the policies of CCP have gotten wholehearted support from each democratic party and personages without party affiliation, as a result, the CCP has become the core of multi-party's cooperation. In the second part, the thesis deals with the inner faction conflict of Kuomintang and the inner solidity of the CCP. This part mainly analyzes the complexity of faction conflict at each period of Kuomintang, and points out faction conflict has not only weakened the rule function of the Nanking Kuomintang Government, but also made Kuomintang lost the opportunity of self-salvation facing the crisis, and brought Kuomintang huge in-fighting. It objectively benefits the development of the revolutionary strength led by the CCP. The inner part of CCP also had conflict, but owing to the continuous intermediation of the Communist International and the intelligence and courage of the Party leader Mao Zedong, the CCP always held the thought of solidity and unity, and as a result the Party's leadership ability and the fight ability of troops were exalted. The third part is about the failure of the Kuomintang in the village and the success of the village land reform of the CCP. This part mainly demonstrates the dissimilarity of land policy and farmer policy and its influence at each period of both parties, and points out the land reform carried on by the Nanking Kuomintang government substantially is the most large-scale land annex by the way of nation political power, so, it encountered strong revolt of the people. Although the land reform policies of the CCP at each period are not the same, they are all for the sake of mobilizing people's revolutionary enthusiasm, therefore, they have gotten the support and advocacy from the people. The fourth part is about the inferior military conductor of Jiang Jieshi and the superb conductor art of Mao Zedong. This part mainly deals with the military conductor contest between Jiang Jieshi and Mao Zedong in the Land Revolution Period and Liberation Period. This part points out the military mistake of Jiang Jieshi performing in the war directly leads Kuomintang's failure of general attack. The fifth part is about Soviet-America policy evolvement on the Kuomintang and the CCP. This part tells us, in post-war period, the United States's policy for the Jang's Kuomintang government, for the sake of its strategy benefits, gradually decreasing from helping Jiang against the Communist to just aid Jiang, and eventually abandonned Jiang. While, for the sake of its benefits, U.S.S.R.'s attitude to China revolution changed from negative inhospitality to secretly support. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics also provided the CCP with help of manpower and material resources, and especially, it offered the CCP with great help in the take-over of the Northeast of China after the war, all above laid solid foundation for the victory of the liberation war. Through the comparison of the policies of politics, economy, military and diplomatism taken by the two parties in the process of their development, the thesis concludes that history resultant force has led to the collapse of Kuomintang mainland regime.Inquiry into this issue has great significance nowadays. What the socialism construction of our country faces is a complications home and abroad. Any factor of instability might endanger the leadership of the CCP. The CCP should draw the history lesson of "the Kuomintang had the country but lost it, the CCP had nothing but seized it", and always persist the "three representative" so as to avoid the cycle of "a country prospers suddenly, and decease soon ", and keep the invincible position.