The Legal Analysis Of Non-really-joint Liability

Non-really-joint liability is the judicial practice common form of liability. However, legal theory and practice on the sector less concern about this issue, its failure to deal with the formation of a unified theory and practice, the judicial workers are often unable to correctly identify the real issues of non-really-joint liability, many problems belonged non-really-joint liability did not receive the right treatment, rather than as non-really-joint liability is the responsibility were carried out according to a decision, either party to the request of the debtor to choose or request to drop the parties, all kinds of different approaches.Even if the justise have recognized that judicial cases involving non-really-joint liability is not true, since it is not true in theory, jointly and severally liable for failure to form a mainstream view of the case and deal with the specific operation, there are still large differences, seriously affected the case Right in time to hear. It is my practice to study the needs of joint and several liability does not really matter for this issue to present their views and opinions. This article introduced the first of what is the legal analysis of non-really-joint liability and the legal analysis of non-really-joint liability is not really the composition, analysis of non-really-joint liability is not really the cause, and non-really-joint liability is not really classified, summarized the current legislation and judicial practice is not true joint and several liability The performance of the judiciary and then how to deal with the non-really-joint liability is not really the point of view on joint and several liability is not really the point of order and physical problems.