| Compensation in the anti-monopoly law is an indispensable part o because of its important role. It is different from civil law, with the value target of anti-monopoly law, not aiming at the equal relationship. compensation for damages in the Civil Law is mainly for the equal purpose while compensation in the anti-trust law is for safeguarding fair competition, promoting economic efficiency, preventing violations, protecting consumers and social and public interests.Damages for compensation in the anti-monopoly law constitute many elements, including subjects. It also includes other elements. For example: the occurrence of violations, fault, causal relationship and so on. These should be considered in the area. In addition, the amount of compensation is a very key issue. For the amount of compensation, it should include the content of calculating, calculating methods. The paper mainly has four views-a multiple of the amount of compensation, the interests, interest and punitive damages for compensation.Proving process is very crucial in the course of compensation for antitrust damages, because it relates he active prosecution of the plaintiff. How to regulate the provisions of the antitrust damages is also difficult. In the proof, the paper involves the responsibility and tis allocation, the standard, and also how to collect evidence and how to prove an offence. |