On Seizing Property With A Lethal Weapon

This article is divided into five partsthe second paragraph of Article 267 the Criminal Code of understanding.The first part discusses the "carrying weapons to snatch" act of judicial interpretation of the meaning of and for the view and the view of the special staff to snatch. I think that, in order to snatch and carry weapons, as well as for other purposes and to carry weapons, to snatch their own pre-conscious and ready to carry a weapon is used to carry weapons to snatch. I also think that the judicial interpretation of the perpetrator is not free of subjective awareness, is defective. I believe that the special officers to have committed the crime of subjective consciousness - the awareness of the use of lethal weapons.The second part of the attention, in particular the meaning of the provisions and characteristics, but also the significance of the distinction between the two discussed. This article holds that the second paragraph of Article 267 the Criminal Code are special provisions, in that it was possible to scramble to deal with acts of crime has changed the approach to robbery offenses.The third part of the requirements, I believe that acts of weapons to carry with the possibility of immediate use, that is dominant with reality, does not require the use of actors or shows that show clear weapons.Part IV discusses the apparatus as a weapon of mass destruction in addition to a certain extent, the act also requires a certain awareness of people, only the person's intent can be an apparatus into a weapon within the meaning of the Penal Code.Part V of the author from both the positive and negative aspects of the Penal Code Article 267 point of view. I get support for the attitude that it has reasonable. Opposition from the crime and the crime constitutes a balanced, objective and subjective aspects, such as a unified opposition.