The Entangledness Between Probability Theory And Judicial Proof

Once upon a saying from western world:Something happens or not,only the God knows! The cognizance to what has happened sounds incredible,just like a "mission impossible",however,this task always comes to the judges'tables with numberless eyes full of expectations.What should the judges do?Seem like the only thing they can depend on is the eveidence.As there are all sort of obstacles in the progress of getting closer to the truce,a perfect cognizance is difficult to achieve.In this background,Probability Theory comes to enter people's mind.Some people expect the mathematics can blow a breeze into the Judicial Proof's world,expect number can convince the people and make them not keep asking why.But the progress of judicial proof is so important that no one can regarded it as a trifling matter.Then,whether the probability theory is able to describe the progress to a nicety and in the line with the law of people's think or not?This is a huge question,which gives birth to this paper.I committed to make clear describtion to what on earth the probability theory and judicial proof are!I know that only a paper is hard to upset people's thinking,but at least I can put the both on a comparative level in order to people who is interested in this question can make a judgement on his own.I am greatly hornerd if this paper could bring inspiration to them!...