The Other Administrative Normative Documents Registration Review

The practical significance of this choice is greater than the theoretical significance; hopes of theory, lead to academic concerns, normative documents on the registration review of such internal oversight role in the way of the actual re-positioning, and the face of great importance to the administration of Internal Oversight the real value in guiding the case through the practice of institutional arrangements to reflect on the theoretical level.My job at the city government the rule of law firms for up to three and a half months time, I appreciate a review of various documents face different issues and similar factors, especially in the cases make arrangements for me personally, I have collected first-hand information . At the same time, I have collected almost all post-2002 dissertation related information, and attention to regulatory documents throughout the review of available comparative approach. Thus the idea of my talk is to find the questions, and then try to find a solution to the problem. This idea of "flaw" is also born with, academic research is bound to meddle in politics, but the researcher has no political experience, but only practical experience, not enough political wisdom, so there's only minimal expression in the language better grasp on scale.This paper tries to avoid "parroting" the expression, "castles in the air" like recommendations, so always put questions in the first place, and therefore it is impossible for the theory exert their own way, like moving clouds and flowing water, very vocal and can not help but fear, timid like a specific analysis, and more focus on the use of experience rather than logical reasoning.Information on the current research is concerned - Domestic: discovery of regulatory documents exist, but most are from the situation only on the classification problem, there is no reason for causing the situation for in-depth inspection process, often ignore the complexity of the background factors led to the solution of a condition that" not prescribe the right medicine." Abroad: In view of the special nature of Chinese question, the normative documents of the study is little information, at once my legal English Translation once found a single, but the articles with the gap between China's national conditions too difficult to draw. Administrative organs are composed of various department, put the rule of law institutions in a confrontation with other departments to the status is not appropriate nor feasible, in the "benefits department," the existence of objective circumstances, insist the building of promoting administration according to law, theory absolutely impossible on a simplistic interpretation of " What is wrong and what should be done".I try to explain the normative document registration review process, I focus on "registration review" study, rather than "normative document" analysis, I describe the work of administration bodies to review the rule of law, describing the reality, which the wording of the article are my characteristics, I have sought a more intuitive description of the actual status, respect for the rationality of the system and found the system inadequate, and further reflection system can improve.Most of the full text is divided into five, the first part is to recognize the normative documents, regulatory documents for the registration review system recognize the introduction; the second part of the registration review of the initial description of the status quo; The third part is from the normative document registration the perspective of the text of the review of the current institutional arrangements for the assessment; the fourth section describes the reality of the registration review status, and from the dynamic point of view are displayed, trying to find my problem, reflection evaluation; Part V have come to the conclusion that in fact review of the rule of law are given a job location.