Study On The Testimony Examination Of Expert Conclusion In Our Country

The first part of this article focused on the relevant theories of Expert Conclusions and concluded that it is a kind of lawsuit behavior in essence, it is personal proof and the expressive evidence ,and it is a technical question of lawsuit from the appraisal object's angle . Therefore it should to carry on testimony examination following the legal procedure.In the second part of this article seeks for legal principle theory of law between the expert conclusion and the testimony examination, and from the economic analysis and the legal proofs angle, conclued that Expert Conclusions is a Legal procedure in essence.The third part is mainly concentrating on the comparing of the Testimony Examination of Expert Conclusion to other country of the world, on the base of the comparing the analysing, discovering that it is rational in the law, thus providing sit for the consummation of our law system.The fourth part is the core of the text, and begins from the system construction, then constructing in procedure and system. Throughout careful inspection of several procedure questions ,attempting to the questioning, and including the direct words principle, the public principle, the litigant participate in the principle as well as the effective defense principle, fully to construct under the goal the procedure just theoretically, thus provides us a brand-new key to the situation for utilization in our country's Expert Conclusions System.