The Case Analysis About"Rogue Software"

With network popularization and rapid development, Because legislation rel ative lag, "rogue software" caused infringement cases increasing. Based on the anti-"rogue software" Union prosecute the "rogue software" company case, the first successful case (v. good little secretary case) and Alibaba (launched 3721 Yahoo assistants, known as "rogue software") v.3 International Corporation (la unched "360 safety defender") typical cases analysis that rogue software not on ly violated individual citizens Informed, options, privacy rights but violated Cor porate copyright and fair competition legitimate interests. However, malware M anagement and Supervision of the existence of the definition does not have an official nature of evidence, the law applicable to difficult legal loss and other problems, to the effective management and supervision "rogue software", to b e in the legislation, from the proceedings of the main conversion, new softwar e development and other aspects of the establishment and improvement.Article worded following structure:The first part is about the "rogue software" Overview, respectively, from the definition, characteristics and classification of three aspects. Second and third part of the citizens of the respective individuals and companies from the two subjects, points out that "rogue software" may violate the rights of the parties that the focus of debate and reason, and given the author's point of view. The fourth part is the base case in front of Governance in China, pointed out that "rogue software" and resolve the difficulties encountered in thought.