The Analysis Of "The Legal Case Of Terrible Responsible Accidents Of Laitiancai"

In the industry of operating firework, the opertators are private businessmen or some farmers who regared as a sideline using small workshop to manage. There aren't any safety conditions in these managements. There are also some phenomenons about employing child labor which caused lots of frequency accidents in this field. There are crimes in some accidents which need criminal judicature to get involved. But in this area of judicature, there are also many controversies in the legal procedure of such cases This in-depth analysis of case in this area identified for proper judicial practice in the scientific conviction and sentencing in such cases has considerable significance.This article elicits two questions about how to convict and suitable limits of the principle of prohibiting repetitive assessment by a typical case which involves employing child labor illegally in "the Legal Case of Terrible Responsible Accidents of Lai Tiancai ". This article combines the research in academic circles of Crime of terrible responsible accidents, Crime of dangerous goods, Crime of unlawful manufacture of explosives, Crime of child labor in critical labor and how to convict these cases, and the principle of prohibition of duplication of assessment in criminal law.This text is divided into three parts:The first part is raise the problem. Introducing the case and different views on the case of the parties. And leads the main issues which discusser by the article:the case of conviction on the case and the suitable limits of the principle of prohibition of duplication of assessment in employing child labor to go in for Crime of child labor in critical labor.The second part is the legal analysis of the problem, first analyzed whether the case constitutes Crime of terrible responsible accidents, Crime of dangerous goods cause accident, Crime of unlawful manufacture of explosives, Crime of child labor in critical labor and the ultimate question of what crime should be convicted; then analyzed that how to make sure the principle of prohibition of duplication of assessment when convict child labor in the critical work. Thirdly, analyze the conclusion of the case. After analyzing, we got the conclusion in this case that both the crime of employing child labor in critical labor and the principle of prohibition of duplication of assessment are one measurement of penalty. This conclusion is not only suit in measurement of penalty,but also for the process of conviction the final conclusion.