A Study On The Relationship Among Villages In Villagers' Autonomy

In the villagers’ autonomy system, there are many structures, and according to the classification these structures can be divided into the village organizations and villagers groups. According to the theory of rational choice, individual’s action decision is rational, thus the action route which village organizations and villagers’ groups, with village leaders and villagers take adhere to a certain of economic rationality. Interest’s integration mechanism is the original power of democracy and autonomy in a certain range. In the current rural society, autonomy of villagers must always be the role of the three forces. The first is the land formed by the partition of the surface pattern, which is the material basis of villagers’autonomy; second is the administration of village organizations and centralized power, and it’s the political environment which autonomy of villagers must face; last is the group of community of interests and exclusiveness, which is the driving force within the scope of autonomous groups. The function of the three forces makes the village organizations have clear tendency to get ride of the groups just operating simply around the administrative system; on the other hand, the group maintains the characteristics of community democratic self-governance in order to limit the interests of villagers within a certain group.Village organizations and villagers’ groups in the scope of Village territory operate respectively in two aspects, and its influences have three aspects on the current villages’ relationship:the first is the inconsistency of interest in the development of villages, followed by the inequality about status of both villages in dialogue, finally is the lack of mutual trust. The effects can be seen; the unharmonious relations between villages and the administrative villages’ organizations have a dominant position to villager group. From the existing political environment, the organization operating rules, it can be presumed:on one hand, the village organizations’ administration tends to continue extending,and the autonomy in the groups have a risk to be compressed further; on the other hand, the spontaneous adjustment of administrative system, the change of leaders’work style, thus the strength of the village organizations service function, all these are a period helpful for relationship’s strength between village in a period, however,the power to promote democracy at the grassroots level is still insufficient.Reflecting the practice of villagers’ autonomy, the path depends on interest integration mechanism. This kind of interest integration mechanism, which means that the establishment of community economy in a certain range meanwhile means the rise of the rural economy. In addition, compared with different operating conditions at two levels of villagers’ autonomy, the specific way which villager autonomy adapts cannot apply the western democratic style mechanically, and it should be compatible with the traditional history and village’s culture.