A Qualitative Study Of Serving Others To Provide "Masturbation" Service Behavior

Accommodating others to provide "masturbation" service behavior is frequent cases innearly two years. About the qualitative research of accommodating others to provide"masturbation" service behavior, theorists have no systematic exposition too; the parties fromdifferent perspectives both have no consensus doctrine. In judicial practice, courts in variousregions treat someone to obtain money, property and then provide "masturbation" servicebehavior to others whether belong to prostitution, and then be convicted and punished for itsorganizers, shelter that appeared in a different verdict, judicial impartiality and authoritywould be questioned. By studying the case about Xu X accommodating others to provide"masturbation" service behavior, and then analysis this behavior could constitute a crime. Thisarticle consists of four parts:The first part is the basic circumstances of the case. Including the cause of action, thecase presentation, the focus of disagreement and debate, these are the basic introduce of thecase itself.The second part is the legal analysis of the related problems, this part in-depth analysisthe case of debate and controversy related theoretical issues, Mainly from three aspects thatthe overview of accommodating others to provide "masturbation" service behavior, thecurrent theories and practices about the definition of prostitution, the analysis ofaccommodating others to provide " masturbation " service behavior crime and non crime, thearticle first discusses the overview of accommodating others to provide "masturbation"service behavior, secondly to explore the theory and practice of prostitution carried on, andthen through the criminal law interpretation, restraining criminal law, criminal policy, judicialpractice to Identified accommodating others to provide "masturbation" service behaviorconstitute a crime.The third part is the analysis and conclusions of the case. By foregoing legal analysis,combined with the specific facts of the case, the analysis of the case from the aspects of thefour elements constituting the crime and concluded Xu X constitute the crime of harboringprostitution.The fourth part studies the revelation of the case. Mainly based on the case study，pointthe limitations of the existing specification defined for prostitution and the problems existingin the judicial practice to accommodating others to provide " masturbation "service case, the legislative proposal competent authorities as soon as possible to explain the appropriatelegislative or judicial interpretation to define prostitution, judicial staff should handle the caseaccording to the context of the legislative and realistic on judicial, so as to meet the demandsof justice.