The Consequences Of Neo-Liberalism And The Enlightenment For China

To the principle of laissez-faire neo-liberalism, emphasizing private ownership based on market mechanisms in resource allocation spontaneous, as opposed to excessive government intervention in economic activities, it is a publicly defend the capitalist system of economic thought. The 20th century, 70 years later, accompanied by government economic intervention policy of the failure of Keynesian under suspicion and attack, neo-liberalism once again rise, and replaced Keynesianism as the Western mainstream economic thinking. In 1979, the neo-liberal Anglo-American practice, starting with the two countries began in 1979, the "Washington Consensus" is the introduction of neo-liberal paradigm in the form of policy began in Latin America and Eastern Europe countries in transition in developing countries to implement a sign. Of neo-liberalism in different countries look at the prevalence, it is undeniable achieved some very positive results, but through the nature of the phenomena, the prevalence of neo-liberalism is a deeper sense of international monopoly capitalism's global expansion strategy of the layout can not be away from the essence of capitalist exploitation, so the prevalence of neo-liberalism is more of the world economy of developing countries, as well as the negative impact of the development. In this paper, the Marxist dialectical materialism and historical materialism as a guide, the use of Marxist political economy theory of monopoly capitalism, market theory, income distribution theory analysis of the neo-liberal practices and its consequences, thus exposing the initial neo-liberal ism worldwide economic crisis caused by the inherent mechanism. Chapter Introduction This article describes some of the major topics of the background and significance, research innovative ideas, as well as papers point. The face of the second half of 2008 an outbreak of global financial and economic crisis, the author combines a tremendously popular in recent years the neo-liberal ideas, after a simple demonstration concluded that neo-liberalism and economic crisis, there is a certain relationship between the need to use a variety of method to be further explored. Chapter II of the liberal economic thought to be in order, comment on each of the classical liberal economic thought, vulgar economics, liberal ideas, new thinking of the classical school of economic liberalism as a means of in-depth understanding of the theory of liberalism and understand the origin of new source of liberal ideas. Combined with theoretical origin of the theoretical framework of neo-liberalism were analyzed. The third chapter focuses on the practice of neo-liberalism, empirical analysis, which describes respectively the neo-liberal Anglo-American countries, Latin American countries, Russia, as the representative of the Eastern European countries, as well as Southeast Asian countries and the consequences of the practice and use inductive deductive method derived the essence of neo-liberal globalization and impact. Foreshadowing in the previous chapter on the fourth chapter to use the Marxist stand, viewpoint and method of the neo-liberal system analysis, comparative study of neo-liberalism and Marxism, the formation of an initial understanding of the nature of neo-liberalism. Chapter V targeted neo-liberalism in both developed and developing countries, the consequences of practice, combined with the fourth chapter, presented the neo-liberal economic crisis caused by the inherent mechanism. The final chapter actually made for the domestic practice of neo-liberalism and its consequences for our inspiration.