Since the establishment of China's securities market, our Ministry of Finance issued several laws and regulations on"impairment", in order to improve the quality of accounting information of listed-companies, and standardize their accounting treatment. On February 15, 2006, the Ministry of Finance issued a new"Accounting Standards NO. 8 - Impairment of Assets". It forbids the reversal of recognized assets impairment provision on long-term assets. To test the effect of the new Accounting Standards, I'll research it in-depth with two methods, theoretical analysis and empirical study.At the beginning of theoretical analysis, I'll introduce the listed-companies' incentives of earnings management combined with the agency theory. Then, I analyze the logic of earnings management and Accounting Standards. Finally, I research the differences when the state controlled companies and the non-state controlled companies use the accounting standards on impairment of long-term assets. After the analysis, I propose two hypotheses: H1, the listed-companies still use the long-term impairment of assets to achieve earnings management incentives. H2, The ownership structure affects the listed-companies in using accounting standards on impairment of long-term assets. To examine the hypotheses, I use a sample of listed-companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share from 2007 to 2009.My empirical findings show that: From 2007 to 2009, Listed-companies still use "impairment" of assets to achieve earnings management. They use provision of long-term assets write-down and their write-off to build up big-bath, to smooth reported income, and so on. The empirical findings also show different ownership structure of companies affect their implementation of the Guidelines. Companies controlled by state tend to write-off less impairment provisions, as compared to companies dominated by holders of non-state shares. My study has important academic and practical significance on the development of accounting standards and financial reporting. |