Font Size: a A A

War Period Kmt And The Cpc Lasting Strategic Comparison

Posted on:2003-01-02Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:B B ZhuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2205360062985840Subject:China's modern history
Abstract/Summary:
Objective of research: finding out the reasons why China won the anti - Japanese war; status and roles of both Communist Party of China(CPC) and Kuomintang(KMT) in the anti-Japanese war.Method of research: analyzing with a realistic, objective, dialectical and historical method.Results and conclusions of research:The lasting strategy about the Anti-Japanese War is the fundamental strategy that China employed to defeat Japanese aggression, is the foundation that all Chinese used to fight against Japan. Both CPC and KMT had made their efforts to establish, clarify and utilize this lasting strategy.Nevertheless, due to the differences in political status, military strength and world view between CPC and KMT, the two parties' guiding strategies showed different features during military practices. This article does the research from four aspects and draws the following conclusions:I. The comparison between the two parties' lasting strategies on formation process. The CPC and KMT formed this lasting strategy with special connotation after an earnest discussion on the basic strategy of the anti-Japanese war at the time crucial for China.II. The comparison on the objective basis between CPC and KMT's lasting strategy. The two parties drew the conclusion of lasting strategy after then- analyzing about both the international background and the conflict between China and Japan. The two parties formed common understandings on the basic characteristics, facts and objectives of the lasting strategy, but they also had different understandings on how to fight with Japan.III. The comparison on the lasting strategy between CPC and KMT. The two parties had great differences on the strategy phase' analysis, strategy deploy and fighting principles. Therefore, different situationsappeared in two battlefields.IV. The comparison of lasting strategic effects of CPC and KMT.Following the fighting principles of the lasting strategy, the CPC and KMT played different rolls, depleted the enemy during the different phases of the war. And finally won the war. But the KMT didn't carry out the lasting strategy completely, as far as the effects of the anti-Japanese war is speaking, the KMT had both contributions and defects. The CPC carried out the lasting strategy, followed the rules of war, depleted the enemy, created the preconditions necessary to defeat Japan and became the mainstay in the anti-Japanese war.
Keywords/Search Tags:CPC and KMT, Lasting Strategy, Comparison
Related items