Modern Chinese "new" Structure Exploration

De-structure is also called De-phrase or De-word group. This thesis focuses on the De-structure, and uses the appellation from Zhu dexi's articles: On the Word De, De-structure and judgment sentence, Self-reference and transferred reference. De-structure is one of the common and frequently-used phrase structures in modern Chinese and is also a quite popular topic in the grammar research. It has been a consistent topic in linguistic studies. Among the many types of De-structure, the one that referring to man is a very characteristic expression, but it is neglected in the linguistics field. Although it is mentioned during the course of analyzing De-structure, the scholars' research mostly limits it to the grammar layer. For example, Zhu dexi, Yuan yulin, Lu jianming, Fan jiyan, Lv shuxiang and so on, they have discussed the different meaning index, whether referring to man or thing, or the rules of omitting key words and the semantic function etc. Until now, articles on De-structure of referring to man have not been found yet, and research on this linguistic phenomenon is worth further analysis and supplement. In view of this, this paper attempts to discuss De-structure of referring to man based on the research of the scholars of the former generation. The author thinks that research into some linguistic phenomenon should be carried out from multi-angles, only in this way, can we find the uniqueness of our native language and promote us to understand the linguistic research thoroughly. The thesis' innovation is that the form of De-structure of referring to man is combed in great detail and is divided into 22 kinds, based on the detailed 2784520 words language materials. The reason which forms the structure has carried on through thorough analysis. From the cognitive linguistic angles, it points out that the category function of De-structure, people' basic thinking mode, verb and the agreement object domain --"people", as well as Chinese unique cognitive psychology are the important elements that affect the structural style. The use of different linguistic style (literature linguistic style and archives linguistic style) is inspected. The functional characteristics of this structure is summarized from the perspective of structural style, the semantic capacity and sentimental color of referred object and so on. The discussion isn't confined to sole grammar domain. On the contrary, it finds a new way to inspect the structure again, based on classification and explanation on the form of structure, from multi-angles to provide certain more valuable new angles of view and mentality to deliberate the linguistic phenomenon.