War Literature Of Regional Differences And Nationality Integration

The color of Anti-Japan War seems to be fading with the time going by, but as the younger generations, we must keep pondering and self-examing the suffering to our Nations from this War. The literature during Anti-Japan War is the important support for that period of history. The historical events, changing of the society, suffering of the War and the tough life of the people are reflected between the words of the Literature. You may find some limitation in the value of Art from the prospect of contemporary tasting standard. Even though, we cannot neglect the status and significance of the Literature in the whole history of Modern literature. We can not deny that the Literature founded the soul of Nationality,and sublimated. We had been researching the Literature science six decades ago, and got much achievement in quantity and quality. Based on this level, we have to start our research in some unique points of view and re-dig the value of the Literature history in the perspective of comparing and Integrating.Regionalliterature, Nationalism, Nationality, Politics and Literature are indispensable for taking the research of Regional Difference and Integrating of Nationality for literature during Anti-Japan War. Based on clearing of these concepts, we should spread the research from following two points of view, Regional Difference and Integrating of Nationality. The previous angle is for constructing a kind of outline of comparing from Politic perspective. Comparing and researching the literature tactic, politic mentality, literature creating of different areas for the period of anti-Japan war, to present the modality, contents, progress of the Literature and the uniqueness and richness of literature historical influence under the system of the War. From the view of literature tactic, the falling areas are the most bloodcurdling ones. The dominators are the Japanese Fascist with flagitious traitors following. So the literature policy which made by these dominators have to be most bloodcurdling, bear the characters of asperity and brutehood. The literature policy in the white area bears the characters of replacing of leniency and asperity along with the changing of the war. As a neonatal regime, the liberated area has the unique bright future. On one hand, we should take enlightened policy to fetch much more artists to join. On the other hand, try our utmost to remove all the disadvantageous factors from the people's political power, appeared the characters of enlightenment and unification. Regarding the politic mentality, due to the policy difference of politics and literature, the characters of forbearance and sneaking, exposure and holding, religiosity and hesitation are taken on the falling area, the white area and the liberated area respectively. War-resistance literature intends to incorporate the separated war of resistance literature into a unified system again from the perspective of integrity, macro scope and tolerance. Coincidently tolerance and distinctiveness of the concept of "nationality" can just integrate it into an organized whole properly the nationality of which reflects more of the traditional patriotism and the political nationalism. The patriotism with long history in China reaches its peak under the intensification of the war of resistance, so under the global control of patriotism literature of war of resistance come to the possibility of unification.There were two main discussions during the War-resistance literature. One is the war strategy school in the kuomintang-controlled area and the other is the format of nationality in the liberated area. Although they are distinct from the ideology, format and content as well as the effect, we would open up the realm of research field if we could break all the restraints of ideology and political position integrating and over viewing it from the perspective of nationality macroscopically.Additionally, benefit from the special given political environment, literature and politics have a closest relationship than every time before. For a moment, literature became the strongest arms for promoting war of resistance. It acted as an education role much more than before, making saving the nation became the most direct and realistic issue. At that time, the critical standard for judging a fantastic writing is whether it can reflect life of resistance in a realistic and prompt way. And this standard is not only followed by writer's literary style but also in correspondence with reader's aesthetic psychological structure. Therefore, under this circumstance, literary work had a tendency of integration in various aspects, such as subject, choice of topic, literature style, literature language, creative intention, etc.Crossing eight years, war-resistance literature is complex and impressed both in the field of literature creation and theory construction, which is difficult to be made a comprehensive and deep analysis. This paper just tries to illustrate from War-resistance literature's difference and integrity, sorting out the progress of its development between unification and division in the view of unity of opposites. Although this method can not attend each and every aspect, it can inspire a colorful War-resistance literature from the limited and partly comparative analysis.