On Intellectual Property Monopoly Law Regulation

The twenty-first century, along with the rapid progress of information science and technology, mankind has entered into a knowledge-and information technology-led "post-industrial era", the capitalist powers and multinational companies in Europe and America waved his hand to create the intellectual property system and use it as bait, and backward developing countries have started cooperation in intellectual property and development, the name is a win-win situation, but also formed a deeper level of their economic potential aggression in the context of how this monopoly of intellectual property rights to regulate and improve intellectual property protection in China has far-reaching significance.This article is divided into introduction, body and conclusion of three parts, of which the text is divided into four chapters.Sony's introduction of the irrational behavior of lawsuits tying start, leads to the concept of intellectual property and to highlight the existence of intellectual property and the current serious situation.The first chapter of the concept of intellectual property and to review, from the theoretical distinction between the abuse and monopoly and comparative analysis presented in the current situation, the importance of the concept of intellectual property monopoly. At the same time through the relationship between intellectual property and intellectual property and theoretical analysis, summarizes several common forms of intellectual property monopoly, and how to define.The second chapter on intellectual property and the conduct of legal regulation of the necessity and feasibility of doing the analysis, the necessity of the analysis as an important part of this chapter, divided into three parts, namely, the trend from the need to curb anti-competitive, public interest principles are limit the need for implementing the three aspects of national policy, focusing on the need for antitrust.Chapter status of anti-monopoly legislation of intellectual property rights do comparative analysis of horizontal and vertical, first introduced the legislative status of the Western developed countries, especially the U.S., EU, Japan, the legislative model, and made a simple comment. The second part of the TRIPS Agreement in China with the application of a single line of each stage of the legal monopoly in the relevant legislation are described in detail, and finally made our anti-monopoly legislation in the intellectual property deficiencies and shortcomings.Chapter IV as the last part of the full text on how to establish and improve the intellectual property system of anti-monopoly legislation put forward some reasonable proposals. Finally, the process of building the system should pay attention to the problem.Epilogue to reiterate that the current intellectual property rights in China anti-monopoly legislation to strengthen the significance of the structure of the text and discussion to make a whole assessment, and point out the inadequacies of the article...