Font Size: a A A

Contemporary Chinese Village Committee Election Candidate Election "no Balance" Problem Research

Posted on:2012-03-24Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:M HuoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2206330335480398Subject:Foreign political system
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Grassroots democracy in China autonomy is an important content of the construction of democratic politics in China, but also the inevitable requirement of rural social development, it is not only the food and clothing of rural society after how better to develop the economy, speed up the construction of the well-off societys need, from big in terms of the development of democracy, grass-roots political democracy construction in China for innovation plays an important role.Along with the development of rural grassroots democracy, local people combinative oneself is actual to the greatest extent of how to play the villager autonomy the political system design, including continuously explore multi-candidate election is the crystallization of the wisdom of crowds. "No competitive elections is not really the election, the difference between the no competition isnt a real multi-candidate election," Wu Jialin jurist competitive election the core essence of their victims. Because multi-candidate election produced for the great effect of village and in the process of village committee elections, all sorts of forces in the election campaign by constantly influence on the electoral power to influence the permeability, produced and introduce candidates. And in this among them, the township government and rural grassroots party branch, rural social clans factions of the role played particularly outstanding. The power of the village committee elections interference makes multi-candidate election appear "no difference" situation, the right to vote and to be ordinary villagers vote for multi-candidate election "no difference" and was overhead and deprivation, votes unbearable villagers tries to improve rural autonomous village elections the desire, the villagers autonomy the dissimilation phenomena appeared largely hindered the construction of democracy steps. Therefore, must be standardized in committee election township government, village party branch and the behavior of multi-candidate election sectarian and guarantee that the villagers in the "self management, self-supervision and self service" to realize "democratic elections, democratic management and democratic supervision, democratic decision-making".This paper firstly committee multi-candidate election on the meaning and characteristic of the explanation and analysis, emphasis on multi-candidate election and a non-competitive difference of the difference, then village multi-candidate election analysis of value, highlighted in the countryside toimplement multi-candidate election necessity. In the third chapter of the village committee to implement multi-candidate election history and status in quo of comb, and make system were pointed out the existing problems and the evils of cause and, finally, the village committee "multi-candidate election no difference" question the analysis of the causes and to make policy recommendations, and concludes that committee multi-candidate election after the law and to the improvement of the system of rural democracy after self-government construction would have played more and more important role.
Keywords/Search Tags:the villager autonomy, committee election, multi-candidate election
PDF Full Text Request
Related items