Font Size: a A A

A Study On The Change Of The Court Power Of Shanghai Public Concession

Posted on:2016-05-04Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:S HuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2206330464455841Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Mixed Court from its inception to the final bureaucratic governing renamed as Shanghai International Settlement consular court, after the ups and downs of Rights Act 1974 Changes in the road. After the 1843 opening of Shanghai, Britain, the United States and France have set up in Shanghai Concession, and the establishment of the Municipal Council in the concession, municipal autonomy Board of Directors of public institutions, legislative, administrative, judicial are independent of the Chinese government. Mixed Court located exploit the advantages of the International Settlement, compared to other parts of the country the traditional bureaucratic, priority access to the progress of the legal system and the rule of law in the West, continue to be affected, but also continue to change. Mixed Court, although the Chinese judiciary, but because it has a modern legal concept, which reflects the impact of more pronounced. In the internal structure and composition, the Mixed Court continues to move closer to the modern court, a clear division between internal agencies to improve judicial efficiency. In 1903, Shanghai, " Su Bao Case " broke out, and the Municipal Council Consul group involved in the case, and in the Mixed Court in the Mixed Court for trial. In this paper, " Su Bao Case " This shocked the nation at the time perspective of the typical cases cut, painted revelation rights law changes and behind the Mixed Court in the International Settlement.
Keywords/Search Tags:Su Bao Case, Mixed Court, Rights Law Changes, Revelation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items