Difficulties In The Application Of Dangerous Goods In Food Supervision

Crime of food supervision malfeasance is the new \ "criminal law amendment(eight)\" in 2011, it enacted, relevant legislation and judicial interpretation is blank, to understand and apply of this crime in judicial practice, judicial organs, judicial organs, procuratorial organs and the judicial and procuratorial organs, judicial organs inside there are many differences and differences, the author according to the first step in and deal with the nanjing food regulatory malfeasance case, according to relevant laws and regulations, the case of harmful consequences, regulatory responsibilities, causality analysis on the specific issues, such as reasoning, and the brief evaluation on the court, according to the study of the case, put forward Suggestions to perfect food regulation of malpractice. This paper points the introduction, text and epilogue three parts, including the text is divided into three parts, the first part is a case, the court judgment and reason; The second part is about the three disputes applicable law in the case analysis, this part is the main body of this article, divided into three pieces of harmful consequences, regulatory responsibilities, causality, each are controversial focus their content, court determination and evaluation, combined with case analysis of three controversial focus applicable law. The third part is to improve the food regulation of malpractice for advice, to help the judicial practice for the future, divided into two parts, refine and grasp the law applicable points, refining the laws and regulations for conviction sentencing suggestion, grasp the point is to apply for the judicial practice of harmful consequences, regulatory responsibilities, and the application of the causal relationship needs to carefully grasp the place.