Linguistic Analysis Of The Court The Power To Speak With The Construction

The discourse power in courtroom trial is the influencing force of trial discourse in courtroom,an invisible force of dominating and controlling the teaching process in courtroom,which reflecs the power relationship in the trial and spreads the influence of power.The New Judgement Reform of Basic Courtroom have been carried at all levels,such as trial ideas, trial goal, trial management, trial evaluation, trial methodology and judge' role. The Courtroom Reform changed the trial process a lot, as well as discourse power in courtroom trial. So it is necessary to discuss the problem of discourse power in courtroom trial,on condition of managing the state affairs by law to provide reference and promotion for the fair and square implementation of courtroom trial.Based on the explanation of the meaning, characteristics and categories of discourse power in courtroom trial,the current research makes the linguistic analysis of the discourse power with conversationg analytical method,courtroom observe method, quantity and qualitative analysis method, induce and deduction method. This essay describes its current situation of discourse power in courtroom trial, set forth the sociolinguistics theoretical basis of the new-style discourse power in courtroom trial, and attempt to construct the basic patter of the new-style discourse power in courtroom trial.The whole dissertation consists of six parts.Part One is an introduction, Its deals with the reason and significance of this study ,and introduce the study situation home and abroad ,the methods taken in this research,the source of linguistic material,and the rewriting sign.Part Two is a summary of the discourse power in courtroom trial. Based on defining the terms of "discourse","power" and "discourse power", we study the connotation of the discourse power in courtroom trial,and analyze the characteristics of trial. On the basis of that, we attempt to classify the discourse power in courtroom trial.Part Three is a liguistics analysis of the discourse power in courtroom trial. The discourse power in former courtroom trial cannot meet the requests of the Justicature Reform.It is very necessary to construct the new-style discourse power in courtroom trial. In this part we use the theory of "discourse turn","switch of turn",and "adjacency pair" to make quantity and qualitative analysis on the language materials,to find the esistance of discourse power and its reason.Part Four is sociolinguistics theoretic base of constructing discourse power in courtroom trial. With the theory of power and solidarity, we point out the relation in discourse intercourse of courtroom trial, that is to say no,in the interaction of courtroom trial,although the main social relationship is based on absolute power,the social relationship of solidarity still exists. On the basis of that, theory of Van Dijk, we farther indicate the relation of intercourse in courtroom trial. With the theory of Van Dijk,the special department of nation and lawsuit parts have the different discourse power, which comes from the difference social position.Finally,we reveals the praction significance of "power"and "solidarity"rules in the discourse power in courtroom trial.Part Five is a construction of the discourse power in courtroom trial on the condition of managing state affairs by law. We attempt to find ways to improve the discourse power in courtroom trial from the aspects as follows: transforming the trial ideas in courtroom, founding new-style courtroom intercourse relationship, sharing the discourse power and advancing lawsuit parts' main body consciousness. The trial system on domdition of managing the state affairs by law is based on such ideas as justice-rooted balue concept of trial,the cultural concept of trial with science and culture combined,the ecological concept of trial focusing on humanity,the comprehensive planning ideas of trial ,the implementing concept of trial ,and the concept of carrying out trial with democracy. The trial should be carried out with justice,and the judge and other participants of the trial should play new roles in the trial at courtroom. The construction of a new kind of discourse power in courtroom trial will be the problem needs to solved immediately , in order to promote the practice of administratin of justice.Part Six is an epilogue, which summarizes the achievement and the deficiency of this essay,and points out the direction of future research.