Criminal Case To The Burden Of Empirical Research

This paper's survey is a grassroots court in western China. The author's study basis on legal empirical research method. Through collecting the criminal court in 1990, finishing 2004 with the number of cases relating to the judicial resources and the court's internal management system in practice the operation of the use of state power as a scientific theoretical foundation-level, Analysis of these factors and the relationship between the burden of a criminal trial courts, and our judges hearing criminal cases the burden of the actual situation.In the introduction to the study authors reflect on the paradigm of traditional Chinese law. the transplant and China's social transformation in the law under the premise of the first chapter, the authors analyzed the subject of research value Perspective and research methods.The second chapter, the authors introduced the N County Court 1990-2005, the number of criminal cases handled. changes in the number of trial, and analysis of the underlying causes that led to this change. The third chapter, the authors analyzed the 1990-2005 N and the number of changes in the county criminal judge, Grassroots courts in the day-to-day work on how to deal with changes in the number of criminal cases. N, and changes in working conditions in the county court's judicial practice center President screening system and the chief justice system and case management system clerk burden associated with the criminal case to be heard within the court Department management system, the county criminal justice system magnifies N drawn conclusions.In conclusion, the author's analysis of empirical evidence. Come to the court's hearing of a criminal case the burden is really on the initiative of state power and social attributes of control demand. Annex cited by the authors collected in the course of the field investigation and trial of criminal cases N county courts at the grassroots level have the burden associated data and information.