Research About The Discipline Inspection And Supervision Capacity Of Forensic Evidence

China's current anti-corruption authority is a discipline inspection, supervision, consisting of three prosecutors, respectively, belong to party committees, governments and judicial sequences, at different levels shoulder the task of fighting corruption. No matter which level of the struggle are inseparable from the identification of evidence of facts of the case. Party discipline inspection organs in the investigation and handling of the civil service and other violations of law, the duty of the alleged crime and criminal responsibility of the case is transferred to the prosecution, the evidence they can get into a legal theory of criminal evidence and the judicial practice of concern focus, focus, and difficult problems.This legal theory from the evidence, discussing the theory of criminal procedure the legality of the evidence that the discipline inspection and supervision body of evidence on the evidence because of defects, is a generalized illegal evidence. To do this, compare the extra-territorial deal with illegal evidence in the practice of representative, and the discipline inspection and supervision of domestic theorists evidence on criminal proceedings of evidence into capacity problems, analyzed the academic point of view. At the same time, compared to the judicial authority the evidence of the practice of discipline inspection and supervisory practices, in-depth reflection of the discipline inspection evidence into the feasibility and necessity of criminal evidence. Finally, system design and specific procedures to be fully operational start of the discipline inspection and supervision capacity of the rules of evidence evidence of the construction, proposed amendments from the practical level, improve the rules of evidence and recommendations, in order to achieve savings in handling resources and improve efficiency of handling cases, to overcome the evidence conversion of the state.