System Of Joint Debt Is Not Real

Joint debt is not really theory developed from the case by the court of civil law theory, which hopes to judicial methods to balance the complex social life of the interests of all parties, especially the balance between the creditor and the debtor and the debtor's rights and obligations between theand fair to protect the interests of the parties.Strengthen the joint debt is not really theoretical research, contribute to clear, and quickly deal with real life, there's all kinds of complicated debt disputes, has strong practical significance.This addition to the introduction is divided into four chapters.The first chapter is not really the basic issue joint debt system. Including joint debt is not really the basic concepts, and similar comparative analysis of the legal system, not the real value of joint debt of the system.Through analysis and comparison, I believe that joint debt is not really a debtor based on the same index or the occurrence of different reasons, the creditors bear the same content the same benefits, all of the debtor to fulfill the obligation of all negative, and because a debtor's discharge, the debtor of allliabilities are attributable to eliminate debt.The second chapter is not really the type of joint debt.By finding the appropriate connection point to a distinction between different types of joint debt is not really the key.The third chapter is not really the legal effect of joint debt.Joint debt is not really into the legal effect of both internal and external.External validity is for creditors and debtors, and that means a claim against the debtor.Internal effect is produced in between the debtor, according to whether the final responsibility to determine whether people generate the recovery between the debtor.Chapter IV is not a real joint debt system in our development system vision.Through our joint debt is not the real status of the system, judicial application of the analysis, I believe that the system should not really into the joint debt of the Civil Code, and try not from the perspective of procedural law system to explore the real joint debt.