Antitrust Litigation Plaintiff Qualification Studies

With China's market-oriented reform strength increasing, the market economy has further development. In the meantime, a large number of monopoly case appear constantly. Various monopoly illegal behavior ragged social organism. Anti-monopoly law appearing, for our country to antitrust regulation provides a legal basis, Our country anti-monopoly law article 50 stipulated the antitrust civil dispute settlement mechanism, But the law is still lack of specific judicial relief program. This will result in judicial practice of difficulty.No of procedure guarantee justice like no teeth rosettes.Anti-monopoly law lack of specific dispute resolution mechanism, which will definitely affect the implementation effect. Antitrust civil dispute resolution mechanism establishment and implementation approach of as the private law, will promote the realization of the public organizations implement, remedy the resources and the willingness to insufficient, make up the low efficiency and appeal of public implementation of single channel to satisfy the transition of the social needs.This article will first of anti-monopoly disputes and antitrust civil lawsuit settlement mechanism of basic concepts do an in-depth analysis,.Then based on antitrust civil dispute resolution mechanism of the plaintiff qualification system, comparison and study of foreign fiction national anti-monopoly plaintiff qualification system do careful study. Put these countries' legislative situation and judicial practice, comparing thereby in specific countries on the basis of the background of distinguish the pros and cons, then give a summary. Finally, in the review of the antimonopoly legislation, judicial situation, on the basis of the plaintiff qualification system construction to make conception.In which the anti-monopoly law provide reference for the establishment of this system.