| The mistake of joint crime is a cross-cutting issue that directly relates to the nature of the joint crime and the mistake in criminal law .this paper discusses from about four parts:The first part is the determination of areas for the mistakes of joint crime.in this part,the author has mainly limitef the mistake of joint crime,and excluded from the content of the content of non-common mistakes, common mistakes can solve crime problems, and non-mistake problem. At home and abroad to discuss common mistakes on Research.The second part is to discuss the deal with the principle of common mistakes, that is consistent with the principles of objective and subjective, the article analyzes the perpetrator's awareness of complicity .The results are inconsistent with reality, these are the Criminal Law of the evaluation objects, knowledge of the perpetrator is just plain guilty of a specific .Crime of intent, the emerging results of an evaluation of criminal law norms as norms, should be within the statutory elements of the abstract composition assessment Price, in order to address acts of complicity in human knowledge and reality of this inconsistency.The third part is the fact that the accomplice Classification of mistake, mistake of fact into a common perpetrator, instigator of the facts mistake on joint crime.the fact that the mistake between the different accomplices, each of which distinguishes the facts mistake and the meaning of accomplice .Inconsistencies caused by mistake, and mistake caused by inconsistent acts of complicity.The fourth part is the complicity of the legal mistake, mainly acts of The fourth part is the complicity of the legal mistake, mainly acts of complicity between the part of the total of prisoners to other actors .Conduct legal awareness of errors, such as joint implementation of committing acts for himself or others, there is not a correct understanding of the offense was abetting abetting acts were the legal evaluation of the mistake. |