| Is a criminal review of the evidence to determine the course of criminal proceedings is an important activity. Its function is to standardize and restrain investigation, pre-trial activities, so that legalized the use of evidence, procedures, and ensure the legitimacy of the evidence, to avoid human rights violations to prevent the detection of infinite expansion.Because the judicial practice in criminal proceedings, the evidence obtained through the investigation, it is inevitable that really false. To determine whether the evidence collected is true, prove that the size of force, and to facts of the case concluded, therefore, need to review the evidence of criminal judgments.However, there is evidence of review of criminal judgments very incomplete, the review of existing rules scattered in the Code of Criminal Procedure Judgement and related judicial interpretations, the lack of systematic, operational, theorists are less involved in this issue. This paper analyzes China public security organs in the review of criminal evidence to determine the difficulties encountered in the process, trying to build this level from the system to analyze the problem and try to build a more comprehensive review of the public security authorities to determine the rules of criminal evidence.Articles were reviewed from the public security organs of criminal evidence and determine the content of the system requirements, our review of the public security authorities to determine the system of criminal evidence form the public security organs to determine methods and Criminal Evidence review specific statutory review of the evidence for four aspects to determine criminal evidence review of the public security organs system to determine the rules of composition, public security organs in China hope to provide some reference for criminal investigation. |