In specific provisions of criminal Law, the concept of correspondence offense is the criminal pattern that the persons who are corresponding sides committed correspondence actions. Such criminal pattern lack any side, can not be valid. The connotation and adscription of criminal pattern has different academic perspectives. The author study the correspondence offense from the Characteristics and classification and try to revert the real meaning of the correspondence offense in the Criminal Law of Japan and Germany. The author study the difficulties the correspondence offense in judicial practice with regard to the questions of the relationship between the crime and general provisions, surrender, metitorious serviceoffset and mutual intermediary actions. Though this article, the author want to solved the problems meted in judicial practice. |