| There is two main aspects involved in the work. The first is to prepare thediameter of3.0mm Mg-Zn-Ca ternary eutectic(E1,E2,E4and E5) alloys rods by coppermold suction casting method, and to invest microstructures, mechanical propertiesand fracture surfaces. The second is to prepare the diameter of3.0mm(Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)100-xMx(M=Cu or Al, x=0,1,2,3,4) alloys rods by copper moldsuction casting method, and to invest the effects of Cu or Al on the corrosionresistances of Mg65Zn3Ca5alloys.According to the eutectic point easy to form amorphous and Inoue’s threeprinciples, this thesis selected Mg-Zn-Ca eutectic point composition (E1, E2, E4andE5) as research objects. The compositions are Mg72Zn15Ca13, Mg62Zn36Ca2,Mg14Zn22Ca64and Mg26Zn48Ca26. The diameter of3.0mm Mg-Zn-Ca ternary eutecticalloys rods were prepared by copper mold suction casting method. Themicrostructures, mechanical properties and fracture surfaces were analyzed mainly byX-ray diffractometry(XRD), optical microscope(OM), micro-electric universal testingmachine and scanning electron microscopy(SEM). The results show that:Mg72Zn15Ca13, Mg14Zn22Ca64and Mg26Zn48Ca26alloys formed composites ofamorphous and crystal phase, Mg62Zn36Ca2alloy formed crystal. The strength andplastic strain of Mg14Zn22Ca64is548MPa and0.9%. For the alloys, the fracturestrength was higher with lower crystallinity. The compressive fracture surfacesshowed that Mg72Zn15Ca13, Mg62Zn36Ca2, Mg14Zn22Ca64and Mg26Zn48Ca26were allbrittle fracture.The diameter of3.0mm (Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)100-xMx(M=Cu or Al, x=0,1,2,3,4)alloys rods were prepared by copper mold suction casting method. The corrosionresistances, surface morphologies and element analysises were analyzed mainly byXRD, electrochemical workstations, scanning electron microscopy(SEM)and energydisperse spectroscopy(EDS). The results show that:(1) The Mg65Zn3Ca5alloy formed amorphous alloy.(Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)100-xMx(M=Cu or Al, x=1,2,3,4) alloys all formed composites of amorphous and crystalphase.(2) The results of electrochemical tests and surface morphologies of(Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)100-xMx(M=Cu or Al, x=0,1,2,3,4) alloys in3%NaCl solution showed that: When x=2, that is the content of Cu or Al was2%, the corrosionresistances of (Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)98M2(M=Cu or Al) alloys was best.(3) The results of quality loss corrosion,electrochemical tests and surfacemorphologies of (Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)100-xMx(M=Cu or Al, x=0,1,2,3,4) in simulatedbody fluid(SBF) showed that: When x=4, that is when the content of Cu or Al was4%,the corrosion resistances of (Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)96M4(M=Cu or Al) alloys was best.Energy spectrum analysis results showed that: When x=2, that is the content of Cu orAl was2%,(Mg0.65Zn0.3Ca0.05)98M2(M=Cu or Al) alloy had good biocompatibility. |