Font Size: a A A

Preliminary Study Of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Imaging Of The Pancreas

Posted on:2013-01-15Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y W WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2234330374966329Subject:Medical imaging and nuclear medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
PartⅠ Reliability of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weightedimaging of the pancreas.Purpose: To test the measurement reliability of parameters in the pancreas derived byintravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materialsand Methods: Thirty-two healthy volunteers underwent respiratory triggered DWI withtwo sets of11b-values on a3.0-T system twice. Perfusion fraction (), pseudodiffusioncoefficient (D*) and pure diffusion coefficient (D) were calculated by IVIM-DWI.Parameters derived by IVIM-DWI were compared between repeated acquisitions andtwo sets of b-values by using the paired t test. Reproducibility of parametersmeasurement on repeated acquisitions were determined by using95%Bland-Altmanlimits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Consistency ofparameters measurement on two sets of b-values were determined by using ICCs. Theeffects of b-values on the reproducibility of the parameters measurements were assessedby comparing ICCs by using the Z test. Results: There were no significant differencesin the parameters between repeated acquisitions (P>0.05), however, significantdifferences in the parameters between two sets of b-values were observed (P<0.05). Dmeasurement demonstrated good reproducibility (ICCs0.806-0.864;95%limits ofagreement12.8-13.6%), measurement demonstrated moderate reproducibility (ICCs0.659-0.711;95%limits of agreement26.8-27.5%), and D*measurement showed poorreproducibility (ICCs0.449-0.630;95%limits of agreement28.3-33%) on repeatedacquisitions. Reproducibility of parameters measurement between two sets of b-valuesdemonstrated no significant differences. There were good consistency of and D ontwo sets of b-values (ICCs0.825), while poor consistency of D*were observed (ICC0.557). Conclusion: There were good to moderate measurement reliability of D and in pancreas, while poor measurement reliability of D*were observed. The limits of measurement error of D, and D*were14%,28%and33%, respectively. Part Ⅱ Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for thedifferentiation between pancreatic carcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and normalpancreas--preliminary studyPurpose: To assess usefulness of parameters derived by IVIM-DWI in differentiationbetween pancreatic carcinoma (PC), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and normal pancreas.Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with pancreatic carcinoma, nine patients withchronic pancreatitis and thirty-two healthy volunteers underwent respiratory triggeredDWI with11b-values on a3.0-T system. D*, and D were calculated by IVIM-DWI,while ADCtotwas calculated by using all b-values DWI. Parameters derived byIVIM-DWI and ADCtotof pancreatic carcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and normalpancreas were compared by the independent-samples t test. Results: There weresignificant differences in between PC, CP and normal pancreas (P<0.01). D*in PCwas significantly lower than CP and normal pancreas (P<0.05), while difference of D*between CP and normal pancreas showed no statistical significance (P=0.200). D in CPwas significantly lower than PC and normal pancreas (P<0.05), while difference of Dbetween PC and normal pancreas showed no statistical significance (P=0.998). ADCtotvalue in normal pancreas was significantly higher than PC and CP (P<0.01), whiledifference of ADCtotbetween PC and CP showed no statistical significance (P=0.815).Conclusion: Differences of ADC value between pancreatic carcinoma, chronicpancreatitis and normal pancreas partly caused by perfusion. Perfusion fraction () mayhelp to differentiate pancreatic carcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreasfrom each other.
Keywords/Search Tags:IVIM, MRI, DWI, Pancreas, ReliabilityIVIM, Differentiation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items