Font Size: a A A

The Research On The Effects Of Oxygen Therapy In The Non-MV Clients After Tracheotomy Using Equipments HH And HME For Humidification And Heating

Posted on:2013-10-09Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2234330395966153Subject:Nursing
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
ObjectivesIn this study, two heated humidified equipments were used in severetraumatic brain injury tracheotomy non-mechanically ventilated patients withlong-term continuous oxygen therapy, the clinical effect of sputum,oxygentherapy,lung infections were observed.Compared the clinical effects of twoequipments,in order to find the evidences to support the long-term continuousoxygen therapy,and reduce the complications caused by the non-mechanicallyventilated patients in the clinical long-term oxygen therapy, improve the qualityof life.MethodsDivided the clients who meet the experimental request into HH group(n=105)and HME group(n=95) accordance with the hospital date randomly, Collectedgeneral information about the two groups of patients, and24hours urine,sputum properties, PaO2, SaO2, etc. HH group use HH for humidification andheating, and HME group use HME. Humidifying effects about sputum propertiesand average daily sputum volume, effects of oxygen therapy on PaO2, SaO2,incidence of pulmonary infection were compared between these two groups on24h、3d、5d、7d、10d、14d.ResultsThere was no different between the two groups on the clients’ generalinformation24hours urine, sputum properties, PaO2, SaO2and so on. On the7th days of heated humidified, the humidifying effects about sputum properties andaverage daily sputum volume, the infection rate on HH group were better than HMEgroup(P<0.05), while there were significantly differences between two groups in thehumidifying effects on the14th days(P<0.01).The effects on oxygen therapy aboutPaO2,SaO2is better in HH group than HME group(P<0.05).ConclusionBoth of the two equipments can improve the humidifying effects, effects of oxygentherapy, incidence of pulmonary infection on the Non-MV clients who receivinglong-term continued oxygen therapy. There is no different between the two groupswhen the oxygen therapy time <7d. HH is better use for the clients after tracheotomywith severe brain trauma receiving long-term continued oxygen therapy(≥7d).
Keywords/Search Tags:Severe craniocerebral injury, Airway humidification, Non-MV, long-term oxygentherapy, HH, HME
PDF Full Text Request
Related items