Analyze And Introspection Of The Critical Theory Of Dialectics Of Enlightenment

Enlightenment should have been the choice of human to get rid of bind and chasing forfreedom. It led the people under the sun of the medieval times instead of the darkness whichopening the door of new civilization so that everyone would enjoy the freedom and materialthat had never Unprecedented. Meanwhile people also realized that enlightenment becomethe new myth instead of the old myth it abandoned. Making the mental world and physicalworld of people completely fall into ruler. But for a second thought, enlightenment is theinevitable choice under the newly history and social condition. Thinking of the value andsignificance of enlightenment, get rid of the sided attitude towards it, adding its positivefunctions and disadvantages. We must know clearly that introspect enlightenment is not go tothe opposite side of it.On one hand, Based on the exclusive age background and theoretical principle, the articleanalysis social critical theory in the Dialectics of enlightenment. Pick up hammersmith andadorno’s definition and introspection theory from it and expound his chasing of all kinds ofsocial problems, summarized their evaluation and introspection of enlightenment vigor and soon. On the other hand, the article analysis from the reflective view of enlightenment ofhammersmith and adorno criticize the academic predicament in the book Dialectics ofenlightenment. Through analysis neoteric enlightenment scholars’ rebuild of rationalism ofenlightenment, from the view of find its value and positive side to find the real meaning ofenlightenment. It’s comprehensive and dialectical. This is really in making the enlightenmentspirit in the new century to take on the responsibility of improving the social progress.