Prevention Of Ming Dynasty Official Duty Crime

The ancient Chinese society of feudal autocracy centralized political system, to determinethe characteristics of the "rule of man", people kept political move, and death of people makepolitical suspend. Thus, the governance of the country first is the governance of the officials. Asearly as the Qin Dynasty, the culmination of the set of Legalism Han Feizi proposed the idea of"Holy Spirit monarch punish officials do not punish people". Governing the country lies in thegovernance officer, governance officer first is the anti-corruption. It can be said that theprevention of official corruption throughout the entire ancient history of China’s own countrysince. China’s rulers, mostly taken the appropriate measures to improve and strengthen thefunctions of the institutions concerned, to the official duties of crime prevention.Ming Dynasty, the authoritarian imperial power of the Chinese feudal society to thepinnacle of the dynasty, at the same time promote the imperial extreme, to prevent the crime ofofficial duties were a lot of exploration and practice, in the legislative, judicial, monitoring,pre-employment training and Officer Selection and assessment to develop a large number ofpreventive measures, and ultimately the formation of a more comprehensive set of content,structure is more stringent preventive mechanism, had a profound impact on future generationsof crime prevention duties.In addition to the Introduction and Conclusion, the paper is divided into four parts. Themain content is as follows:PartⅠ: discussing the historical background of official positions crime prevention in MingDynasty. The early Ming rulers draw the Yuan Dynasty rule of law and chaos, the official windscorn officials is unclear because of the painful lessons of a broken, started to establish aneffective, convenient and flexible official duties of crime prevention mechanism .This is not onlythe specific political and economic situation, but also with the emperor personal mark.PartⅡ: on the Ming Dynasty official duty crime prevention measures. This idea under theguidance of the Ming Dynasty rulers through a variety of ways and channels to strengthen theprevention of the crime of official duties, this chapter will summarize the six aspects, namely,legislative, judicial, monitoring system, the official pre-training, selection and assessment. Thesix complementary function together, so the official duties of crime to be strangled in theideological, to prevent possible trouble to put into action. PartⅢ: a critical analysis of a comprehensive study of the Ming Dynasty to the preventionof official duties of criminal history background and preventive measures on the basis of theMing Dynasty, crime prevention official duties. However, the formulation and implementationof the law there is a difference in the specific implementation process, for various reasons, didnot reach the desired results of the rulers still exist the phenomenon of official corruption, to theespecially severe late in the Ming Dynasty, from another which reflects the Ming Dynastyofficial duties of crime prevention has limitations.PartⅣ: a summary of the first three sections summarize the experiences and lessons of theMing Dynasty, the prevention of crime of official duties, its essence, and better guide us intoday’s anti-corruption work.Ming Dynasty on the history of the official duties of crime prevention is a microcosm of thewhole ancient Chinese official duties of crime prevention. It is the Ming Dynasty’s influence isobvious. However, to the late Ming Dynasty, Emperor incompetence, leading to the eunuch, theCabinet disputes, party struggle after another, the wind of corruption is worsening. The mainreason attributed to imperial interference in a serious conflict of etiquette, which has become theultimate effectiveness of crime to hinder dynasties prevention official duties made shackles.