The Law Analysis Of Li Chun And Other’"Robbery" Case

Since the1990s, new forms of crime "Robbery" case, seriously endanger the personal safety and property safety of the public across the country. Supreme People’s Court for such cases in2002,2005, have issued a judicial interpretation, especially for Robbery resulting in serious injuries, In particular, the relevant legal provisions in the2005"Robbery" special circumstances of robbery and convicted and punished. At this point, the judiciary in respect of such cases, convicted and punished in a unified legal basis.This article uses the typical cases of’Snatching causing serious injury. In this case, the behavior Robbery others belongings process, causing the victim serious injury results, compliance with the robbery of "violence, coercion or threats of violence, degree, and perpetrator its snatch behavior cause the cause the subjective state of mind of the serious injuries is indirect intentionally caused a big controversy in judicial practice. I hope to focus triggered by the case proceed to analyze the fundamental difference between the snatch crime of robbery, and analyzed how to accurately determine their subjective state of mind from the "Robbery" behavior of the actors, the judiciary and accurate qualitative such cases provide a reference.