The Empirical Research Of The Judgment Of The People’s Court

The people’s court is the agency that the grass-roots court set up under one’sjurisdiction and at the same time it’s the frontline positions of judgement. Resolve socialdisputes and have judicial value of direction which is the important function of the people’scourt. However, what as we all know that the people’s court rooted in the rural areas. Onone hand, long-term survived unique folk customs and the judicial modernization constantcollision, On the other hand, the rural society are experiencing the transformation what isfrom “acquaintances society” to “half acquaintances society”. There is a big gap betweenfarmer’s rights consciousness and legal knowledge reserve. These factors make people’scourt trial mechanism face special difficulties. Therefore, under the premise of maintainlegal basic dignity, from the point of view of the people’s court judge improved andaccording to the real example, explore a flexible mode of judgment of the grassroots socialdispute settlement is very necessary. With a people’s court of JinTan city for example, thereality of judgment and resolving disputes condition are investigated. This text will havethe past scene and then see the pain, in order to put forward of our country people’s courtsystem future reform direction and measure originally.