Font Size: a A A

Refusing To Implement The Decision,Ruled That The Crime And The Legislature Perfect

Posted on:2013-08-07Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W LiuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2246330371991077Subject:Criminal Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Refusing to implement the judgment, ruled that the subject of the crime for the general subject, there is no obligation to perform or assist in the fulfillment of the judgment of the People’s Court ruled that the "Third Party’ error referee and was given no legal obligation "false obligor, the unit shall beincorporated into the main body of the crime up; should grasp the recognition of this crime, criminal behavior of refusing to implement the "understanding and ability to perform" to determine to determine whether two key comprehensive defined; identified for this crime, the circumstances of the crime should be "behavior", comprehensive evaluation of the consequences of behavior,"the implementation of the subject"; article of the crime and the crime of obstruction of official business, illegal disposal of seizure, seizure, freezing of property crime and intentional homicide, crime of intentional injury boundaries were analyzed.Refusing to implement the decision, ruled that the crime of crimes objects too narrow exists, the actors are not comprehensive, counts expressed are not strict, legal punishment set unscientific and other defects, should be improved, the same legal effect and implementation of the contents of the conciliation statement, notificationbooks, orders, decisions, people’s mediation agreement and other judicial documents should be fully integrated into the scope of the crime object; units into the main body of the crime; and modify the counts, the addition of the punishment to sentencing grades and types of; and then refusing to execute the judgment or order crimes "perfect for the" crime of obstruction of justice instruments ":the people’s court to prejudice the effective performance of judicial documents, assist in the fulfillment or otherwise prejudice the implementation of activities of the people’s Court, the circumstances are serious, and three yearsimprisonment, criminal detention or control, or a fine gold; right before the sentence had been passed yet to fulfill their obligations or to cause other serious consequences, more than seven years in prison and fined. If a unit commits the preceding paragraph of this crime, shall be fined directly responsible person in charge and other direc penaltiest in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Keywords/Search Tags:Refusing to implement the decision,ruled that the crime, Judicial determination, Legislative Defects and Improvement
PDF Full Text Request
Related items