Study On Case Of Wang Et Al Fraudulent Purchasing Economic Affordable House

With the accelerated process of urbanization, further imbalance in the supply anddemand of urban houses. Combined with the real estate group, real estate market sideis a large number of suites vacant, while on the other hand, prices high in a largenumber of people could not afford the house situation. In this case, the statedecisively launched the affordable housing policy to provide assistance to themajority of who cannot afford to buy real estate, however, is the country’s preferentialpolicies, making some criminals the opportunity to defraud the state benefits todisrupt the affordable housing the distribution of order. Wang et al use bribery andother illegal means, in collusion with internal staff, manipulate the order ofdistribution, the illegal purchasers eventually smoothly shake in affordable house.According to Wang et al outlaws fraudulent purchase behaviors, the need to use thecriminal law to be regulated, but in the present criminal law no corresponding charge,the need for a separate defraud the public welfare crime to be convicted and punished.The reason why To start a criminal regulations, because fraudulent purchase behaviorfor their own gain at the expense of the interests of others, with serious violations;Second, although people have designated based on the interests of illegal, and useforged documents of the relevant material way cheating economy applicable roomqualifications of behavior model and the crime of fraud of the general mode ofbehavior have in common, but not only designated behavior diverted to the others ofpublic welfare, and the more serious is infringed upon distribution order of economyapplicable house, not fully comply with the crime of fraud of the object request,cannot is directly relevant provisions of the punishment of crime of fraud. In addition,the direct use of the crime of fraud to be regulation existence of illicit profits isdifficult to identify the fraudulent purchase of property rights cannot be traded, thesentence is clearly too heavy and other defects, the need for a separate defrauding thepublic welfare offenses to regulate them.