| Proceedings toachieve democratizationand the rule of law,wemustexclude theevidence obtained by illegal means, which is the protectionof human rights andconsiderations of judicial impartiality. Excludingillegally obtained evidence gained popularity and recognition system inmany countries. The United States, Britain,Germany and Japan in thelong-term practice and exploration, development and the establishment ofcriminal illegal evidence exclusion rule. At present, our country hasalsoset up illegal evidence exclusion rule still exists the problem ofinteroperability is not strong, practical application and matching systemis not perfect, but due to a late start. Improve our criminal illegalevidence exclusion rule, the need to clarify China’sillegal exclusionaryrules of the theoretical basis; improve the criminal illegalexclusionaryrule; and then to improve the criminal illegal evidence exclusionrulematching provisions. |