The United States To China Countervailing Problem Research

International trade remedy measures, one of the anti-subsidy, can be seen as afundamental right of international economic law subject, it is the WTO "agreement onsubsidies and countervailing measures of regulation. As one of the member countriesof the world trade organization, China in international trade, of course, we can enjoythis right, or in other countries to our country to take the measure to take measures toput a stop to it, but the premise is we must to multilateral agreements and relateddomestic legislation to have in-depth research and understanding.Domestic legislation on subsidy before GATT established is rare in the world.Because America’s legal system is sound, the subsidies also earlier specification.Worldwide, the United States domestic law on subsidies to standardize the maturethan in other countries, is relatively better. As a result, the United States tocountervailing measures in the world have the effect of the vane, also had animportant effect to other countries, WTO countervailing rules is also inner guidancerole. Rising U.S. trade protectionism in the current, in the bilateral economic andtrade activities, based on their own interests, the countervailing measures in largequantities in China, gained the huge benefits, while we suffered huge losses. Americahas been clearly felt China hopes to solve the urgent request of market economy statusas soon as possible and the strong desire, in order to obtain maximum political andeconomic interests, continuous use of China’s "non-market economy status" problem,to expect to achieve the goal of increasing price. So for China’s rapid economicdevelopment has formed a very strong effect. Non-market economy status the conceptitself is not a lot of sense. But, in the practice of the United States, have begun toapply countervailing measures step by step with the international trade of our country.More detailed introduced in this paper the transformation process of domesticlegal system, and compare the WTO rules and the United States. Because our countrynational condition is special, before the reform and opening up in China hadexperienced a long period of planned economy period, during this period our country social activities are arranged, therefore our country’s economic policy with nationalunified arrangement is given priority to, so the policy of reform and opening up totoday our country’s economy still traces of planned economy. This face anti-subsidyforms in China is very bad. So, our country need to perfect the relevant laws andregulations in a short time on behalf of the interests of the enterprises in our country.