This paper examines the extent of firm level overinvestment of free cash flow and the impact of the Split-Share Structure Reform on the overinvestment. I find evidence that, under split-share structure, overinvestment is significantly positive related with positive free cash flow and ownership concentration of the firm, which suggests that the overinvestment is a manifestation of the agency problem, including the agency problem resulted from interest conflicts between managements and shareholders and interest expropriation resulted from interest conflicts between non-tradable shareholders and tradable shareholders. After comparing the overinvestment behavior before the Split-Share Structure Reform and after, I find that the sensitivity between overinvestment and positive free cash flow decreases, and that the effects of ownership concentration on overinvestment are weakened. So I conclude that the reform reduces overinvestment and alleviates the agency problem. The evidence also shows that executive ownership incentives appear to mitigate overinvestment after the reform. In summary, the Split-Share Structure reform fixes the interest conflicts between non-tradable shareholders and tradable shareholders, reduces the interest expropriation behavior and improves corporate governance significantly. |