| The defending battle of Nanking is the national revolutionary army after the Songhu battle during the Anti-Japanese War. This defense battle was an important war, because the city of Nanking was the capital of the Chinese national government. Although it has gone for more than75years, the study of this history and the discovery of historical achievement is still continue. Especially, with the deepening of the Nanking massacre research, scholars have long been research as a background of the Nanking massacre occurred in Nanking, also gradually into the academic field of vision, and gradually become an independent research subject. General research about the Nanking battle sacrifice still has some controversies, worthy of our in-depth study and discussion.This thesis mainly through three parts:firstly, describes the research background, Nanking battle sacrifices generals disputed by Nanking battle research changes and results comparison, put forward about the battle of Nanking sacrifice generals disputed. Secondly, the battle of Nanking, the sacrifice of generals dispute, also is the core content of this article. For each research unit issued a few cross overlapping but not the battle of Nanking sacrifice general list proposed own question, through a lot of access to historical data and documents, especially the authority files from the Second Historical Archives, general reference to sacrifice the posterity of oral history data, and the latest certification authority research unit, try to give the most fair Nanking battle list of sacrifice generals, to the identity of the historical figures present a more accurate definition. Will also be about Nanking battle several contradictions that sacrifice generals to specific locations and controversy around Nanking battle field was discussed. At last, the thesis is about influence of Nanking battle sacrifices generals disputed research thinking and enlightenment, and respectively from the factors that influence the controversial general study sacrifice generals to research the role of the dispute, and sacrifice the research of general debate, these three aspects are discussed. |