Indifference To Danger Abroad Crime Legislation And Its Reference To China

Indifference to Danger should incriminate began in the eighties of the last century led to a series of tragedies in recent years, with the frequency and intensity ofdangertosave the phenomenon, its serious social harm caused by the universalfor legal and moral debate, while academic discussion of this issue into a new climax.Crime Legislation for Western See Danger save its reference study of this topic, the author previous research results-based, using inductive reasoning, comparative analysis demonstrated methods and examples, column data wrilingthe method for article argument-"China should learn from the experience in Western legislation, the ’crises do not save’ legislation specific argument analysis, in order to more in-depth theoretical study and scientific danger Unconcerned. By Western Indifference to Danger sin a mature legislative experience and legislative model comparative study, seeking our Indifference to Danger Crime Legislation reference, and proposed recommendations I of Indifference to Danger Crime Legislation.Articles removed by the introduction and conclusion, is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of the "Danger do not save" and "Danger Unconcerned", in this part of the author of Danger does not save behavior and Indifference to Danger sin to do conceptual definition and Discrimination analysis of for ’Danger not save the status of regulation; respectively the second and third part of civil law and common law Unconcerned danger legislation, and cited the relevant case analysis of the legislative history; Western Indifference to Danger crime Legislation to promote the fourth part of the argument; the last part of the article, the author first pointed out the necessity and feasibility of additional Indifference to Danger sin, and then learn from the advanced Western legislative experience on the basis of our future Indifference to Danger legislation see their little thin.