| "Anti-Soviet Union the United States" diplomatic strategy formed on the late60s of last century, the early70s. In essence, a joint United States contend Soviet Union. World nouvelles began to rise during this period, began to rise during this period, Soviet hegemony strategic situation into attacking the United States to keep the Soviet Union. The Chinese national security in the face of the plight of the United States and Soviet attack in the north and south, made a decisive "anti-Soviet Union the United States " diplomatic strategy. With the implementation of this strategy and Mao Zedong put forward the "three worlds" theory of division, easing Sino-US relations, China’s legitimate seat at the United Nations to resume, Widespread establishment of diplomatic relations with the Third World and developed countries. China’s international status and influence began to enhance, to appear in the international community.The successful implementation of this strategy for the Chinese brought the Soviet forces contend, maintaining a safe country, completely cracked the Chinese diplomatic security dilemma and the passive situation, the Chinese diplomacy from passive to active, this is a new history of China’s foreign relations nexus critical’period. Today, research on "anti-Soviet Union the United States" strategy in addition to re-examine the history of the strategy, more important is that the summary of their experience, and important reference on the current China’s diplomatic strategy. Through this strategic understanding and reflection, further deepening the China of Mao Zedong Thought on Diplomacy important contribution to understanding the diplomatic strategy.To promote the maturation and development of China’s diplomatic strategy. The current China as a great power a gradual rise in the international community in dealing with relations between big powers should actively learn from this strategy for China’s diplomatic influence, especially when dealing with the trilateral US-Russian relations, taking into account the historical issues at the same time it should primacy of the interests of the national reality, and actively build a "win-win" for the purpose of the new relations between big powers. |