The eighteenth session of the National People’s Congress pointed out that to let farmers have the equal right to share the profits and the achievements during the modernization process, establish land requisition system, improve the allocation proportion of farmers in land value-added income, promote the urban and rural elements exchanged equally. And the equalization of public resource allocation, industrialization promote agriculturalizing, established the new urban-rural integration relationship. In the process of the rapidly urbanization of China, the sacrifice the farmers’ profit by constantly requisite farmers’ land have been made great contribution to modernization the farmers. In view of this, this article thesis clearly has important practical significance and theoretical valueIn this paper follow the logic paradigm:issues raisedâ†'research tool selectionâ†'problem analysisâ†'measures discussion. Aside from its "Introduction" and "Summary and Outlook", the frame structure consists of four main parts:The first main part is "theoretical basis of this study: sustainable livelihoods theory". This part defines and describes the main points, analytical framework and core elements of the theory, which provides theoretical tools for the study.The second main part is "the social background and appearance of land-lost farmers’ survival and developmental plight". Firstly, this part interprets that the rapid urbanization is the social reason for the land-lost farmers’survival and developmental plight by a quantitative way. Then this part presents the land-lost farmers’suffer in the plight of the survival and development from the life, safety, rights, culture, education and so on.The third main part is "the policy causes of land-lost farmers’ survival and developmental plight".This part analyses the policy causes of land-lost farmers’survival and developmental plight from five dimensions:land compensative standard is too low, land compensative ways are too simple, job placement policy is empty, old-age and health insurance policy is lack.The fourth main part is "the exploration of policy optimization on promoting land-lost farmers’sustainable livelihoods". This part bases on the concept of promoting land-lost farmers’sustainable livelihoods, builds a "five in one" policy mode on perfecting land-lost farmers’security policy:perfecting the land requisition compensation policy, establishing the system of subsistence allowances for land-lost farmers, land-lost farmers’job placement policy, create the land-lost farmers old-age security system, and introduce land-lost farmers health insurance measures.This paper’s innovative intention is mainly performed in the following three aspects: Firstly, innovation of the analytical tools. By use of the theory of sustainable livelihoods, the part analysis the problems of land-lost farmers’survival and developmental plight, and builds the policy strategy which beyond the plight, which is quite rare in the domestic academic circles, it has new extensive meaning. Secondly, innovation of the academic insights. This paper treats the problem of land-lost farmers with overall concept, the system concept and dynamic view. It considers that the problems of land-lost farmers associate with the rapid urbanization, the environmental policy and the land-lost farmers’ own qualities. Thus solving the problem of land-lost farmers needs systematic thinking and interactive force. This academic opinion is novel in domestic academic circles. Thirdly, innovation of the policy suggestion. This paper builds a "five in one" policy mode on perfecting land-lost farmers’ security policy, which has both outstanding originality and great applicative value. |