Surrogacy has become a common phenomenon in modern society, and our legal norms in terms of surrogacy has not yet introduced, the Ministry of Health alone currently does not have a personal complex operational department regulations prohibit them, unable to solve the surrogate caused property disputes. Therefore, only on surrogate standardized management, develop and improve relevant laws and regulations, strengthen administrative supervision, to ban all illegal surrogate phenomenon. Meanwhile, in order to protect the reproductive rights of infertile couples, the law should allow the aid of human assisted reproductive technology will be within a reasonable range of fertility, both of infertile couples doing individual families to bring hope, but also a surrogate market standardization and social stable sense of order is significant.In this paper, Yao and tan mou surrogate disputes as a starting point, first, by reviewing the basic facts, outlining the case proceedings focus of controversy both parties, and then on both sides of the original defendants dispute the point in surrogacy agreements legally binding and surrogacy mother surrogate child is entitled to visitation rights to analyze. Secondly, based on the analysis of disputed points of law, the surrogate parent-child relationship in any finds that the legitimate rights of the surrogate mother and the surrogate child protection and how to think. Finally, the legal norms of how to use a surrogate and surrogacy perfect sound system made some comments. This paper aims to initiate, through the Yao and surrogacy disputes tan mou some superficial analysis and reflection, to draw the attention of the legal department of the surrogate problem and hope legislation on surrogacy as soon as possible, so that such problems are well resolved. |