China’s Competitive Aerobics Aerobics Women’s Singles Exercises And Technical Level Of Developed Countries Comparative Analysis

The rapid development of Chinese aerobics, in international competition is the aerobicspower. Through continuous efforts of China’s competitive aerobics every item achieved verygood results, especially the collective project, many times in international competition was thefirst, in contrast to China’s women’s singles project results have been less than ideal. In recentsessions of the World Aerobics Championship in the women’s singles, our country has notentered the top three,2012twelfth World Championships in China Women’s singles player MaChao, Huang Jin Xuan did not reach the final, only ninth and sixteenth. In competitive aerobicsdevelopment of20years, there is a preliminary exploration understanding of women’s aerobicsproject. But the data show that most of the studies only for a technical point, and on thewomen’s singles project overall technical level of research papers.This study used the method of literature, video analysis, mathematical statistics, logicanalysis, and comparative analysis, comparison and analysis of the twelfth Aerobic GymnasticsWorld Championships women’s singles top3video data and FIG "2009-2012competitiveaerobics competition rules", find out the Chinese women’s singles and women’s singles worldpower gap. According to the results of the study are as follows:1、 By the physical structure of music, choice of difficulty and excessive use ofconvergence reflect the the Chinese team physical reserves far behind the advanced countries,but also reflects their lack of adventurous spirit of sport.2、 Presented in a Chinese team and the advanced countries, there are still some gaps,especially the utilization of venues, the use of the route are still some deficiencies. The twoathletes parade of the lack of innovation and personality, a combination of operation, but thesymmetry of the upper and lower extremities in line with the proportion of aerobics trends. MaChao’s difficult even in the choice of difficulty, Huang Jinxuan the difficulty of partial D group.3、 Two athletes in terms of the performance of the operation is relatively simple, actionPianman strength is not high enough, there is no prominent music features, the entire set ofappeal is not enough, high-impact performance by the limitations of the music, with the topthree athletes thanthere is a big difference. Completed in quality two athletes is relatively stable,but the score is not high enough, a difference of0.35points with the title, there is a significantgap. 4、 The analysis revealed that the two players is not comprehensive enough, each thereis a problem, for example, Huang Jinxuan difficult choice and complete the completion of poorquality. The Ma Chaocheng sets is not smooth enough, pause points more, these are the reasonsbehind their competition results.